Re: Inconsistency with dhandlers
"Jonathan Swartz" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.mason.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On May 10, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Jonathan Swartz wrote: > > > Ok, that makes sense for the default behavior of decline_dirs=>0. As > > you > > say, it is backwards incompatible. So I'll schedule it for 1.3. > > A parameter would be nice in the interim. How far away is 1.3? I don't know...sigh...I'll go through the 1.3 task list in the next few days, I think there are some things that can definitely be cut so as to release this quicker. There are lots of little changes like the one above that are worth getting out. I know a new parameter would be nice, but given that you can put a small piece of code in the autohandler or in a handler.pl...... Jon ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3