Re: Inconsistency with dhandlers
David Wheeler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.mason.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On May 11, 2004, at 8:59 AM, Jonathan Swartz wrote: > Nope, Mason gets a chance to handle the directory; if it declines, > Apache > transfers control to mod_dir. This is why we have to explicitly > decline by > default in ApacheHandler. I don't know why this is; it might have to > do with > the precedence of SetHandler over mime type. Apache handler experts, > feel > free to speak up. I suspect that it's because mod_dir runs in the Apache response phase, and because Mason does, too, it replaces mod_dir. If Mason declines, then the default Apache handler, including mod_dir, will execute, instead. But there ought to be a way to chain them, so that mod_dir runs before ApacheHandler... Regards, David ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3