Re: Patch and test to allow component calls
Alex Robinson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.mason.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <a06110459bd77c1c2f47a@[192.168.1.201]> |
[apologies if this comes through twice] >So how about this: If a <&| &> tag contains a literal string as >defined above, then you can use either </&> or </& LITERAL>, where >LITERAL is the exact literal they specified. Otherwise, they can >only use </&>. This is mostly as John suggested, except that we >don't let them use </&> for expressions. That sounds ok-ish to me. I still prefer the arbitrary way since the expressioned cwcs require commenting just as much if not more so than the literals but I'm happy to go with Jonathan's solution. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php