Re: Patch and test to allow component calls

Alex Robinson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.mason.devel
Message-ID <a06110459bd77c1c2f47a@[192.168.1.201]>
[apologies if this comes through twice]

>So how about this: If a <&| &> tag contains a literal string as 
>defined above, then you can use either </&> or </& LITERAL>, where 
>LITERAL is the exact literal they specified. Otherwise, they can 
>only use </&>. This is mostly as John suggested, except that we 
>don't let them use </&> for expressions.

That sounds ok-ish to me. I still prefer the arbitrary way since the 
expressioned cwcs require commenting just as much if not more so than 
the literals but I'm happy to go with Jonathan's solution.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.