Re: mass commit
Dave Rolsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.mason.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Jonathan Swartz wrote: > All unit tests -- including a number of new tests -- are passing for me > except 14-cgi.t (6, 7) and 19-subrequest.t (7). I don't know anything > about the former. The latter is autoflush_in_parent_not_subrequest, > which I believe is the test that Dave R said is currently known to fail. I'm getting a fair number of failures: t/07a-interp-mcr.t 16 4096 17 16 94.12% 2-17 These basically all fail t/08-ah.t 135 133 98.52% 1-7 9-97 99-135 Same here. This is because of this: "Can't locate object method "comp_root_array" via package "My::Resolver" at /new/autarch/mason/dist-HEAD/blib/lib/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm line" so fixing it should be easy(ish) t/16-live_cgi.t 9 2 22.22% 3 9 Looks like it may be related to flush/clear t/19-subrequest.t 1 256 16 1 6.25% 7 Yes, this should fail. I removed it from stable, but I figured I'd leave it here til we really hammer out how subrequests should behave. t/99-pod.t 11 2816 34 11 32.35% 1 4 6 8 10 13 19 21-23 30 Did these ever pass? We have lots of our own formatting codes. I thought I might've arranged to have these tests run against the post-processed POD, but maybe not, or perhaps that got unfixed? -dave /*=========================== VegGuide.Org Your guide to all that's veg. ===========================*/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl