Re: mass commit
Jonathan Swartz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.mason.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I'm getting a fair number of failures: > > t/07a-interp-mcr.t 16 4096 17 16 94.12% 2-17 These all pass for me. Could you send the MASON_VERBOSE=1 output? Do you have any unchecked-in changes that could be affecting it? > > These basically all fail > > t/08-ah.t 135 133 98.52% 1-7 9-97 99-135 > > Same here. This is because of this: "Can't locate object method > "comp_root_array" via package "My::Resolver" at > /new/autarch/mason/dist-HEAD/blib/lib/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.pm line" > > so fixing it should be easy(ish) Whoops. Will fix. > > t/16-live_cgi.t 9 2 22.22% 3 9 > > Looks like it may be related to flush/clear Ok, I'll take a look. > > t/19-subrequest.t 1 256 16 1 6.25% 7 > > Yes, this should fail. I removed it from stable, but I figured I'd leave > it here til we really hammer out how subrequests should behave. Ok, but isn't there some way to mark a test indicating that it is known to fail...? > > > t/99-pod.t 11 2816 34 11 32.35% 1 4 6 8 10 13 19 21-23 30 > > Did these ever pass? We have lots of our own formatting codes. I thought > I might've arranged to have these tests run against the post-processed > POD, but maybe not, or perhaps that got unfixed? > I don't have this one, did you check it in? Jon ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl