Re: Re: 1.3 soon?

> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
>
> >> needed to support a resolver that pre-computes resolution of each
> >> component.  I started working on this, but realized that it required
some
> >> API changes to the resolver.  I need to revisit this and see what
changes
> >> need to be made, if any.  It might be that your change to move the comp
> >> root to the interp object makes this possible now.
> >
> > Ok, take a look. But why would this be a prerequisite for a release of
1.3?
>
> It's not.  I just want to make sure you're not considering this release to
> be the last word on API changes ;)
>
> > I'm certainly not considering the branch stable at this point anyway -
it is
> > most definitely beta until more people use it and we go through a number
of
> > bug fix releases.
>
> I'd call it alpha if we're still open to API changes.

Good points, both. I'd still be interested in getting it out there in the
spirit of RERO. Calling it alpha for the first few dot releases until we're
settled with APIs seems reasonable.

Jon



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/