Re: 1.30?

On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Jeremy Morton wrote:

> That's just great.  I raise a perfectly legitimate issue/suggestion for
> Mason and you ignore it, and steamroller ahead with the next version.
> Thanks a lot, shows that this bloody mailing list works.

A legitimate issue which got a good discussion, the conclusion of which 
appeared to be that you could use $r->method to get much of what you want.

A couple meta-points:

1. We owe you nothing.  Don't forget Mason is developed by _volunteers_.

2. Acting like a jerk makes it _much_ more likely you won't be listened to 
in the future

3. Just cause we release 1.30 doesn't mean that you can't bring this up 
for 1.31, but see #1 and #2.


-dave

/*===================================================
VegGuide.Org                        www.BookIRead.com
Your guide to all that's veg.       My book blog
===================================================*/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf