Re: 1.30?

On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, John Williams wrote:

> Maybe we should consider making CGI the default for Apache2?

I suppose we could.

> There are reports that MasonX::Request::WithApacheSession does not support
> Apache2.  MasonX::Request::WithApache2Session might have problems too,
> since it was released before the big rename.  I don't use either though,
> so I haven't verified the reports.

I _really_ wish someone would take this thing over, cause I don't use it 
any more, in favor of MasonX::WebApp and Apache::Session::Wrapper.

> And we also have modules with names like:
>  MasonX::Request::HTMLTemplate::WithApacheSession
>  MasonX::Request::ExtendedCompRoot::WithApacheSession
> Maybe it's time for a shiny new plugin-based session module?

Sure sounds good to me.


-dave

/*===================================================
VegGuide.Org                        www.BookIRead.com
Your guide to all that's veg.       My book blog
===================================================*/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf