Re: My fault for not catching this before 1.30, but...

On Aug 18, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:

> Indeed.  What's weird is that it looks like  our code but A) it has  
> no docs; and B) gives us no credit (except in the changes).  The  
> uploader even left in our stub docs so that it shows up as  
> HTML::Mason::FakeApache under Documentation on search.cpan.org.
>
> Weirder still, the code itself still refererences Mason, notably  
> HTML::Mason::Utils.
>
> Anyway, it's cool that someone's repackaged the code but it'd be  
> nice if it was, uh, usable outside of Mason, and documented ;)

He did it after I contacted him a few months ago about updating  
Apache::Emulator with what we'd done in HTML::Mason::FakeApache and  
then proceeded not to (new baby and all). So he just went ahead and  
did it. Yeah, pretty lousy job, but he was more than willing to  
accept a patch from me...I'm sure he'd take one from you, too.

Best,

David




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf