Re: Mason 2.0 thoughts

On May 13, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:

> On Sun, 13 May 2007, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
>
>>>
>
> I think we're on basically the same page. I'm just saying that we  
> can use
> the syntax we have, but extend it to allow calling subroutines,
> components, and "named" filters. Now, I don't know exactly how we'd
> distinguish all of them, but I like the idea.

Unifying filters and CwC is certainly interesting and makes the  
explanations a lot easier.
If you're going to allow subroutines as filters, please please please  
make it just as easy to use a block or a method call on an object.


Jesse
> -dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/

_______________________________________________
Mason-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-devel