Re: Mason 2.0 thoughts

On May 13, 2007, at 7:35 PM, Jonathan Swartz wrote:

>
> On May 13, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 13, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 13 May 2007, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I think we're on basically the same page. I'm just saying that we  
>>> can use
>>> the syntax we have, but extend it to allow calling subroutines,
>>> components, and "named" filters. Now, I don't know exactly how we'd
>>> distinguish all of them, but I like the idea.
>>
>> Unifying filters and CwC is certainly interesting and makes the  
>> explanations a lot easier.
>> If you're going to allow subroutines as filters, please please  
>> please make it just as easy to use a block or a method call on an  
>> object.
>
> Would you be ok with a built-in "Apply" filter that takes a  
> subroutine? e.g.
>
> <& Apply(sub { tr/a-z/A-Z/ }) |&>
> [content]
> </&>

Sure!

Jesse

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/

_______________________________________________
Mason-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-devel