Re: Mason + FastCGI

> OK; then why not use only what you need?  It'd be trivial to write  
> an app whose
> Controller::Root had a single action (at /, with any number of args)  
> that
> handed off to a Mason view to do the real work.  You get fastcgi and  
> the
> standalone server for free AND the Mason component reloading that  
> you enjoy so
> much.
>

That's been my thinking about Catalyst lately as well - use it for the  
engines and API and standard dir structure, and dispatch immediately  
into Mason for controlling etc. Of course, it's telling that I haven't  
done this for any of my pure-Mason servers yet. it's either not  
trivial enough or not compelling enough.

> (Even better would be for Mason to work on PSGI, but that's not a  
> useful
> suggestion right now.)

Yes, this will be wonderful. I assume by "not useful" you mean that  
PSGI/Plack isn't ready for prime time yet?

Jon


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf