Re: data-* attributes
Jean Kaplansky <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:35:30 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.mathematics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D078F27F.2CFE1%[email protected]> |
It’s not just the W3C validator. We found a similar issue with the Design Science MathFlow integration into oxygen XML 15 earlier this year at Pearson School. We solved the issue by moving the data-* attr. Out of the MathML. Jean Kaplansky Senior Director, Solutions Architecture [cid:C375CA72-728E-4AD2-BD1E-1983CDC575C8] o: +1.518.496.2967 twitter: @JeanKaplansky See our new website<http://www.aptaracorp.com/> From: Peter Krautzberger <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, October 31, 2014 at 6:13 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: data-* attributes Resent-From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Resent-Date: Friday, October 31, 2014 at 6:14 AM Hi www-math, I've recently noticed that the W3C validator<http://validator.w3.org/check> considers HTML5 documents with data-* attributes on MathML elements invalid. I'm wondering if this is a bug. It also made me wonder in how far the MathML spec could adopt data-* in general. The spec suggests<http://www.w3.org/Math/draft-spec/mathml.html#chapter2_interf.unspecified> namespacing for unspecified data. When working in both XML and HTML5 contexts this seems less than ideal. Best regards, Peter. -- Dr. Peter Krautzberger MathJax Manager mathjax.org<http://www.mathjax.org/> | fb.com/mathjax<http://fb.com/mathjax> | @mathjax<http://twitter.com/mathjax> L<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/peter-krautzberger/45/4a4/6a5>inkedIn @pkrautz<http://twitter.com/pkrautz> Click here<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/QiUGz5anlZTGX2PQPOmvUqbyJUddZf2SrOAaxNSHS7+FvKDRWAtr4g1p4Vj8kvahURTedY0s2WMeRLY+cWrx9g==> to report this email as spam.
BBB76444-9E76-484E-A968-BAB4B1029170[8].png
(image/png, 4.9 KB) - not displayed