Re: lmoustache/rmoustache as stretchy delimiters
Neil Soiffer <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Aug 2015 13:21:23 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.mathematics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAESRWkCE7t=5ZDhSFHK5P4mY5U8Gw3NtUDb9Ow9B4uLgU3YX1w@mail.gmail.com> |
You are indeed right and I'm wrong. For whatever reason, the \big (and \bigg) versions of those characters produce very different looking characters than the non-stretched ones in LaTeX. So I agree with David's original suggestion for the values. Neil Soiffer Senior Scientist Design Science, Inc. www.dessci.com ~ Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, MathDaisy, Equation Editor ~ On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Khaled Hosny <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:24:35PM -0700, Neil Soiffer wrote: > > I believe that the entry in http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names is > wrong. > > > > I wrote an example in LaTeX and 23B0 & 23B1 are *not* the glpyhs that > LaTeX > > produces. > > CM fonts seem to not have normal size glyphs for those two, try > \big\lmoustache and \big\rmoustache. The TeXbook only shows the big > glyphs. > > Regards, > Khaled >