Re: MathML is a failed web standard (or not?)

--089e0149392acc0901052f74a1c6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I write as a chemist who has tried to do the same thing with Chemistry
(CML, Chemical Markup Language). I have been inspired by what I see as the
success of MathML and do not regard it as a failure. I am particularly
interested in Content MathML as computable maths.

The reality seems to be that it takes a generation for many of these ideas
to be implemented. in 1998 SVG seemed to be the obvious way of doing
graphics, but after 5 years it looked close to death. After 15 years it's
become universal.

CML is used by a small number of enthusiasts. The chemical software
manufacturers don't care because they only care about the pharma industry
and instruments. So we strugle on with a number of ad hoc broken
representations of chemistry, which are still primarily graphical. There is
almost no chemistry for blind people.

The real problem is semantics. At the moment the world doesn't care. They
will have to in the future. IoT demands semantics. You cannot compute
pictures. Binding semantics to maths and chemistry is hard but it will have
to come. I'd guess that people will need semantic math in 5 years and
chemistry in 15.

If you let the world be driven by browser manufacturers and publishers you
will get a sighted-human vision of maths and science. The IoT won't need
browsers.

It WILL need semantic maths.


On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Paul Topping <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Peter Krautzberger of MathJax fame, recently posted this on his own blog:
>
> MathML is a failed web standard
> https://www.peterkrautzberger.org/0186/
>
> Obviously, he presents some challenges to the MathML standard and its
> community. I felt that I had to respond:
>
> Response to Peter Krautzberger's "MathML is a failed web standard"
> http://bit.ly/1ZLfCF8
>
> I hope this exchange prompts some serious dialog.
>
> Paul Topping
>
> Design Science, Inc.
> "How Science Communicates"
> Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, Equation Editor
> http://www.dessci.com
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069

--089e0149392acc0901052f74a1c6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>I write as a chemist who has tried to do the sam=
e thing with Chemistry (CML, Chemical Markup Language). I have been inspire=
d by what I see as the success of MathML and do not regard it as a failure.=
 I am particularly interested in Content MathML as computable maths.<br><br=
></div>The reality seems to be that it takes a generation for many of these=
 ideas to be implemented. in 1998 SVG seemed to be the obvious way of doing=
 graphics, but after 5 years it looked close to death. After 15 years it&#3=
9;s become universal.<br><br></div><div>CML is used by a small number of en=
thusiasts. The chemical software manufacturers don&#39;t care because they =
only care about the pharma industry and instruments. So we strugle on with =
a number of ad hoc broken representations of chemistry, which are still pri=
marily graphical. There is almost no chemistry for blind people.<br><br></d=
iv><div>The real problem is semantics. At the moment the world doesn&#39;t =
care. They will have to in the future. IoT demands semantics. You cannot co=
mpute pictures. Binding semantics to maths and chemistry is hard but it wil=
l have to come. I&#39;d guess that people will need semantic math in 5 year=
s and chemistry in 15. <br><br></div><div>If you let the world be driven by=
 browser manufacturers and publishers you will get a sighted-human vision o=
f maths and science. The IoT won&#39;t need browsers.<br><br></div><div>It =
WILL need semantic maths.<br></div><div><div><br></div></div></div><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11=
:10 PM, Paul Topping <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]=
om" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc soli=
d;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
Peter Krautzberger of MathJax fame, recently posted this on his own blog:<b=
r>
<br>
MathML is a failed web standard<br>
<a href=3D"https://www.peterkrautzberger.org/0186/" rel=3D"noreferrer" targ=
et=3D"_blank">https://www.peterkrautzberger.org/0186/</a><br>
<br>
Obviously, he presents some challenges to the MathML standard and its commu=
nity. I felt that I had to respond:<br>
<br>
Response to Peter Krautzberger&#39;s &quot;MathML is a failed web standard&=
quot;<br>
<a href=3D"http://bit.ly/1ZLfCF8" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http=
://bit.ly/1ZLfCF8</a><br>
<br>
I hope this exchange prompts some serious dialog.<br>
<br>
Paul Topping<br>
<br>
Design Science, Inc.<br>
&quot;How Science Communicates&quot;<br>
Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, Equation Editor<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.dessci.com" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http=
://www.dessci.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_sig=
nature">Peter Murray-Rust<br>Reader in Molecular Informatics<br>Unilever Ce=
ntre, Dep. Of Chemistry<br>University of Cambridge<br>CB2 1EW, UK<br>+44-12=
23-763069</div>
</div>

--089e0149392acc0901052f74a1c6--