Re: I18n/l10n
Ted Husted <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.maverick.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Apache Software Foundation - Jakarta Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Schnitzer, Jeff wrote: > My only concern is that it would make life harder for nontechie > designers. Then again, it might not - the XSL templates would rarely > need to change, and it would be easy to build up a "vocabulary" of xml > elements so that actual page content might look very simple. The > downside of this is that it completely abandons standard html editor > tools... which were probably choking on the velocity anyways. If a project is using non-techie designers, then the best thing for that project would to use an IDE that has its own templating system. Which is the other great thing about Freemarker/Velocity, it works with everything right out of the box. But, if you've got guys like us doing the HTML too, then XSL is an excellent option. And with development tools like Maven and Forrest floating around, it's often a familiar option as well. -Ted. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf [INVALID FOOTER]