Re: Proposed XSLTransform Modification

Schnitzer, Jeff wrote:
> If you need this, it sounds fine to me.  Probably want to make the
> attribute "monitor" rather than "monitored".  
> 
> I think we also got a quorum for the package renaming - Ted, want to
> kick that off?

Sure, but first:

* Does anyone else have any other tweaks they would like to post?

* Were there any other changes to be entered to the log?

* Is the CVS list broken? Are we using the syncmail mail script?

And finally:

* I'm thinking a good strategy would be to bring out a 2.2.1 with 
everything but the package renaming, and then do a 2.3.0 with only the 
package renaming. Does that sound all right?

Not to mention:

* What release process are we using?

The current trend would be to roll a 2.2.1 distribution and post that 
for everyone to try. Then we vote on whether to promote the 2.2.1 
release from "alpha" to "beta" or "general availability". If never makes 
GA, we make whatever changes are needed and try again with 2.2.2. The 
idea being releases are immutable, and not every release is a final GA 
release.

-Ted.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
[INVALID FOOTER]