RE: Pluggable ControllerFactory (again).

> From: [email protected]
> 
> I had a look in the mailing list archives on the discussions
> of support for pluggable ControllerFactory-implementations.
> I'm wondering what the status on this is. Will Maverick, at
> some point, support user defined ControllerFactories? It
> would seem natural, given the flexibility given for other
> factory types within Maverick. Basically, I want to supply
> a factory that asks a PicoContainer to get the controller
> for me (without having to modify the Maverick source code).

If you're volunteering to investigate the approach :-)

Maverick evolves in an as-you-need-it kind of way.  If you have a
specific need, try to fit it into the framework - the code is very
simple and easy to understand.

I suggest kicking off the discussion by defining a set of requirements
or maybe an interface or two that you would like to see satisified.

Jeff 


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
[INVALID FOOTER]