Re: Use Apache Commons Logging instead of log4j

Mike Moulton <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Jun 2004 09:48:41 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.maverick.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
There have been a few global changes that have been pending for a 
while. For instance there was the discussion of repackaging everything 
to net.sf.mav.*. If I'm not mistaken there were a few other changes as 
well. Maybe now would be an appropriate time to readdress some of the 
changes including this logging change.

I don't see any major problems switching to commons logging, personally 
I will still use log4j.

Thought, Jeff, Scott, Jim?

-- mike

On Jun 1, 2004, at 6:56 AM, Jon Newton wrote:

> What is everyone's opinion on changing maverick to use the Apache
> Commons logging API instead of hardcoding a dependency on log4j. My
> reason for wanting this would be to cut down on the large number of jar
> files my project is accumulating.. I'd like to use java.util.logging as
> much as possible. This would also make maverick even more flexible..
>
>
>
> Jon Newton
> Scan Business Systems
> 800-906-7226
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 
> 10g.
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click
> [INVALID FOOTER]
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 2.3 KB) - not displayed