Re: Use Apache Commons Logging instead of log4j
Mike Moulton <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Jun 2004 09:48:41 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.maverick.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There have been a few global changes that have been pending for a while. For instance there was the discussion of repackaging everything to net.sf.mav.*. If I'm not mistaken there were a few other changes as well. Maybe now would be an appropriate time to readdress some of the changes including this logging change. I don't see any major problems switching to commons logging, personally I will still use log4j. Thought, Jeff, Scott, Jim? -- mike On Jun 1, 2004, at 6:56 AM, Jon Newton wrote: > What is everyone's opinion on changing maverick to use the Apache > Commons logging API instead of hardcoding a dependency on log4j. My > reason for wanting this would be to cut down on the large number of jar > files my project is accumulating.. I'd like to use java.util.logging as > much as possible. This would also make maverick even more flexible.. > > > > Jon Newton > Scan Business Systems > 800-906-7226 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle > 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click > [INVALID FOOTER]
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.3 KB) - not displayed