Re: Hibernate questions

Do you have an example that does this, Klaas?  If so, that would be very 
much appreciated, including the xml?
At 08:58 AM 4/2/03 +0200, Klaas Eikelboom wrote:
>In the web.xml you can specify a listener that is called when the
>application is started
>(This is part of the servlet 2.3 specs). The same listener can be used at
>the moment
>the application is closed
>
>mvg Klaas
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Simen Brekken" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:40 AM
>Subject: Re: [Mav-user] Hibernate questions
>
>
> > I am still a bit unclear on what the best approach to this might be, if
> > anyone has any examples I'd be very grateful
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:55 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Hibernate questions
> >
> >
> > > From: Simen Brekken [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >
> > > I was wondering if there's anyway of performing the expensive
> > Hibernate
> > > initialization steps (init datastores, setup factories) somewhere
> > other
> > > than
> > > perform using a ThrowAway controller.
> >
> > Create an Initialize servlet that is load-on-startup'd before everything
> > else.  You can store datastores, factories, etc in the application
> > attribute context or just as static members of the Initialize servlet.
> >
> > > Also, what's the benefit of using a ThrowAway over a singleton
> > controller?
> >
> > I think this is really just a question of taste.  For many simple
> > applications, the ThrowawayBean controllers are an easy way to build a
> > lot of program logic with a single class.  However, when you find that
> > you have a common form used in different commands, the inheritance chain
> > this requires tends to get ugly.  It is often more convenient to use a
> > FormBeanUser style of controller in this case.
> >
> > In CVS right now there are two versions of friendbook-jsp, one which has
> > ThrowawayBean2 controllers and one which has FormBeanUser controllers.
> >
> > Personally my preference has been to use ThrowawayFormBeanUser as a base
> > controller class - it provides the best of both worlds, IMHO.
> >
> > Jeff Schnitzer
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
> > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
> > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
> > [INVALID FOOTER]
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > [INVALID FOOTER]
> >
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
>Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
>No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
>http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
>[INVALID FOOTER]




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
[INVALID FOOTER]