RE: using commons logging instead of log4j ?

Fair enough. As I said, I am pretty happy with Log4J as well so that's fine.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Schnitzer, Jeff
  Sent: donderdag 17 april 2003 23:39
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: RE: [Mav-user] using commons logging instead of log4j ?


  Hmmmm, not sure about this one.  Everyone seems pretty happy with log4j,
and nobody has yet asked to be able to use other logging mechanisms.  (At
least for now) it doesn't seem like doing the search/replace and adding the
extra configuration complexity of commons-logging would be worth it.



  Jeff Schnitzer

  [email protected]



  -----Original Message-----
  From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[email protected]]
  Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 3:57 AM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: [Mav-user] using commons logging instead of log4j ?



  Hi,



  I was wondering why Maverick has a dependency on log4j instead of using
the commons logging package. Personally I prefer log4j to the JDK logging
api. I just feel that for a framework it would be nicer to postpone the
decission of which logging api to use for the users of the framework. This
is what you achieve when you use the commons logging package.



  What do you all think?



  Eelco