RE: CommandPipeline

"Schnitzer, Jeff" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.maverick.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Nothing was committed to CVS.  There was also some problem using the
current chaining mechanism with opensymphony, so it needs to evolve
further.  If you have some idea for what you would like with regard to
chaining, we can probably accommodate.  
 
Jeff Schnitzer
[email protected]
 
-----Original Message-----
From: David Cruwys [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Mav-user] CommandPipeline
 
Hi list,
 
Hopefully I'll be a regular visitor to this mail list, I finnally got
disgrunttled enough with Struts and JSP to go looking for an MVC to use
as the base for two web portals that I'm building and I spent all day
yesterday researching (15hours reading of the scrren, yes I've ordered
some new Eyesballs) and have come to the conclussion that Maverick is
going to be kick ass, I hope it does not disappoint.
 
Anyway I've ready about 4 months of forum messages and looked at a lot
of the source code and was just wondering how the thread on  Controller
Chaining #1,2,3,4 & RFC end up as far as changes to the Maverick Code,
did a CommandPipeline get written and added to the package or was a
different solution found.
 
Cheers Dave,
 
P.S. Anecdotal Evidence from reading the list has gotton me very excited
about maverick and its easy intergration with Velocity, bye bye Struts
and JSP.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.