Re: Schema/QB: table:field vs. table.field
Torben Nehmer <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:03:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.midgard.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
appearantly I speak in riddles or seem to have some crazy understanding of
software development.
>>>... and API consistency (which we don't have very much of it right now).
>
> Torben , details please.
... and ...
>>>add_constraint("property.object_property:attachment.metadata.created",...)
>>
>> Sorry, but this is plain hell!
>
> 3 QB's "subinstances" could be better?
... makes me think that way at least.
*Of Course I was talking about the . vs : distinction!!!!
EOT, q.e.d. and the last attempt for me to give any input, this is wracking my
nerves. Lets just hope PHPs regexes are fast enough for me to easily wrap this.
Live long and Prosper!
Torben Nehmer
- --
Torben Nehmer, Guenzburg, Bavaria, Germany
http://www.nathan-syntronics.de, mailto:[email protected]
PGP Public Key: https://www.link-m.de/pgp/t.nehmer.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD8YDNJPh4Kn6d5FYRAhBsAJ9Vj7aYzwATuXUST+2td04Yn0o4AwCfRjX2
akIVbeceRSDbOoEGBFuQOFk=
=juoq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----