Re: 1.8 issues

Tarjei Huse <tarjei-y/[email protected]> wrote:

> > I am still against having different separators depending on context. Reasons
> > have been elaborated in detail. The short version: API consistency and Ease of Use.

OK, I do not say -1 or +1. I just think that it brings ( and will ) some limitations 
to property names. Once we can support one separator we must forbid property 
name like 'attachment'.

> I agree with torben. For the same reason, I would also like to have the 
> simple object->sitegroup usage instead of todays setsitegroup().

That is indeed a bit difficult to change property value. 
All properties have ( should have )  the same generic setter and getter in language 
bindings , so checking for sitegroup property changes brings some difficulties on 
language level , not in core. 

Piotras