Re: object setsitegroup

Piotras wrote:
> "Jukka Zitting" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/8/06, Piotras <pp-VVDi8QVAvoBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote:
>>> However , many times I am logged in as SG0 admin ( using basic auth)
>>> and I create objects and set their sitegroup later.
>>> Just because I can not open and close my browser every one minute.
>>> ( which of course proves that one admin host per sg is a good thing )
>> How about if a new object inherited the parent objects sitegroup by
>> default. That would take care of a lot of problems. Something like
>> this:
> 
> I think that real use cases are:
> 
> 1. Create new sitegroup with admin group and admin person.
>     And this can be solved with ability to set sitegroup when create method is called.
Please add :
Also create host (as you have to be sg0 for that), pages and topics for 
the sitegroup.

> To sum up , I would like to propose:
> 
> 1. Sitegroup settable only when create method is called.
> 2. Sitegroup not settable when update is called even for SG0 admin.
> 3. setsitegroup method should be replaced with object's replication.
?? Please explain that one.
> 4. mgd_auth_midgard should have sitegroup name parameter 
+1
> 5. Sitegroup delimeters should be dropped, or optionally supported.
Maybe only supported in basic auth?

Also, you should remember that this will brake all legacy admin interfaces.

Tarjei
> Piotras
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe-b5ZhpPVuLA+tlBvVaVFjCkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>