RE: More RESTful interface?

I echo Joyce's sentiment, Mark.  Go for it!

  Adam



Joyce wrote:

> Not that I know of.  Most of the people who are interested in mps
> right now are concerned with speed and scalability, not protocol.  Go
> for it!  JP

In response to Mark's writing:

> Has anybody made any attempts at providing a cleaned up interface to 
> support a more RESTful use of HTTP?  For example, using (many) kn_* 
> as HTTP headers, using the same request URI for GET and POST, a 
> "WATCH" or "MONITOR" extension method for non-GET routing, etc.. 
> 
> I'm trying to do some app-to-app stuff (no browser involved), and I'm 
> finding the protocol quite hairy. 
> 
> I'd be happy to work on this (on pubsub.py - Perl makes me ill), but 
> I thought I'd check first to see if anybody else was. 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504