Re: The way this discussion list is configured
Forrest Corbett <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:59:58 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.omniweb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 7, 2006, at 4:16 AM, Beth Katz wrote: > On Sep 7, 2006, at 2:40 AM, Patrick James wrote: >>> Yes. Many high-traffic lists are configured in the same way. I think >>> this list can change the Reply-To field to <[email protected]> >>> as it is not so much high-traffic ;-) > > This isn't high traffic now because there's the OmniGroup forum > for discussing such things: > http://forums.omnigroup.com/index.php > > But the current list arrangement forces you to think about whether > you want to send your reply to everyone. This topic comes up every so often. It's called "reply-to munging." It's considered a bad thing. I googled and found this site: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html I didn't read all of it but at first glance it seems to give a good explanation why not to do reply-to munging. -Forrest