Re: reply-to munging

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:54:09 +0100, Mark R. Hilton wrote
(in message <[email protected]>):

> Yes, it does have a "reply to all" ... I took the article to mean 
> "reply to all" and "reply to group" were different, that "reply to all" 
> is to all the addresses in the "To" and "Cc" headers, and that "reply 
> to group" would somehow reply to a list specifically. I have removed 
> the "Reply to all" button from the toolbar, and have so rarely used it 
> anyway that I don't know the keystroke and would use the menu entry if 
> necessary.

I have never used an email client which to my knowledge had a "Reply to 
Group" ability or a "Reply to Readers" as described here in an earlier post. 
The most likely client I can think of which might have this would be Eudora 
because it is so very customisable, but it is some years since I have used 
Eudora. However "Reply to All" is very common indeed.

> As for the other matter, the point here is that the "Reply to" address 
> on the Omni lists is the list itself, hence GyazMail does do as it 
> should.

The emails arrive to me without omniweb in Reply-To header.

> Thanks for clarifying for me that "Reply to all" and "Reply to group" 
> are in fact the same thing, or at least come to the same thing.

My interpretation of this thread is that they are not considered the same 
thing by those that have mentioned them, but I could be wrong  :)


-- 
Patrick