Re: Forcibly removing plugins seems to help memory usage
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.opera.linux |
|---|---|
| Organization | I know I put it down here, somewhere. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> writes: > Kenneth Crudup <[email protected]> writes: > >>>> Hey, anyone else using the 64-bit Flash plugin beta from Adobe? >> >> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Daniel Pittman wrote: >> >>> Yes, and I don't see any of the file descriptor leaks, pipes or VM size issues >>> that you do, using the 9.64.2480.gcc4.qt3 packages on Debian. I saw the same >>> on Ubuntu, incidentally. >> >> Which video chipset and XOrg driver were you using? > > NVIDIA mobile G80, with the binary driver, lucky me. > Version: 185.18.14-1 Actually, it occurs to me only in hindsight that you are probably interested in more data points than just that one, so: This also worked correctly (same version) with: ATI R600 chip with ATI Catalyst binary 8.3 driver. ATI Mobility M7 chip with open source ATI drivers. Intel G-something-less-than-Poulsobro[1] with open source Intel drivers. All of these would have been Debian or Ubuntu systems. Regards, Daniel Footnotes: [1] Sorry, I don't actually have this hardware, and didn't note those details down anywhere I can locate. -- Opera-Linux: https://list.opera.com/mailman/listinfo/opera-linux More lists: https://list.opera.com/mailman/listinfo/ Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe