Meta Tags - Regulation and Censorship Thread
"Mike Newman" <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Apr 2003 09:34:15 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.p3p.policy |
|---|---|
| Organization | E-Brochures UK |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Meta Tags - Regulation and Censorship Thread Can anyone shed some light on the following situation? I am a UK writer and adviser on "Internet Matters for Business" and I am presently researching a specific topic for publication. Briefly, the situation is this: a website has been published that, in the meta tag search section, contains an entry (say) "ACME ABC". The ACME company has complained to the ISP that the term "ACME ABC" is a registered trade mark and cannot be inserted into a meta tag. The ACME complainant did not object to "ACME ABC" being used in the general editor= ial content of the website. But only in the meta tag which it alleged was an infringement of its copyright. The ISP removed the website even though the term "ACME ABC" is contained = in the editorial columns of hundreds of newspapers every day, and is general= ly promoted by the company as its popular name and is used as such in all it= s own corporate and marketing literature. However, the website owner then inserted ",ACME ABC PLC," into the search meta tag instead since it was not a registered trade mark. ACME again complained that even though "ACME ABC PLC" was not a registered trade mar= k, the full phrase contained "ACME ABC" which WAS a trade mark and once agai= n alleged an infringement had been made! The ISP withdrew and banned the website totally and permanently. Could anyone advise me or even suggest where I might find authoritative information on any =93laws=94 or Internet =93conventions=94 governing the= permitted or prohibited content of meta-tag search references (excluding decency an= d libel and suchlike? I am researching a business article on topics that include this particular aspect. [email protected] Mike Newman mipr UK Business Communications Consultant