RE: Re: Organising apps in svn

On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 11:36 +0200, Sigurd Nes wrote:
> > From: Dave Hall [[email protected]]
> > Sent: 2008-05-19 11:09:40 CEST
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Re:  Organising apps in svn
> > 
> > On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 01:28 -0700, Sigurd Nes wrote:
> > > 
> > > Looks like Maat has a clear idea on how this could be arranged.
> > > If there is no objections - I would like to ask if someone could take
> > > on this task (preferable Maat - since he seems like the expert here).
> > 
> > As discussed in the past, phpGroupWare doesn't _need_ to anything.  It
> > is our private repo which has issues, so we need to be make the changes.
> 
> Oops - seems like I have misunderstood the situation completely - sorry.
> The shortest route will then be to arrange the Resight tree as the current phpGroupWare tree - and we should be ok.
> 

It won't actually solve the problem of how long it takes to create clean
patches.  It will save some time, but not a lot.  Changing the resight
tree still won't allow semi automated patch set generation.

> > It also makes more sense to start the work in our private tree, so if
> > you get it wrong the impact is massively reduced.
> 
> I misunderstood - I thought phpGrouWare was looking for a new arrangement - and that  Resight should adapt to it.

phpGW has agreed to do this months ago, but when it happens depends on
when someone has a spare weekend.  As we discussed when we last met, it
makes sense for ReSight to do it in a coordinated was instead of having
to change our internal tree structure twice and allows the timing to be
coordinated.

Cheers

Dave