Re: Organising apps in svn

Maât <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.phpgroupware.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dave Hall a écrit :
> But it is for developers, not people who just want to install and use
> phpgw as is.  developer_tools should be a standalone module, it is not
> broadly useful.
setup to generate database structure definitions is no more useful... 
but it's in setup !

Atm we need more to attract new developers tnat to gold plate the 
project removing a few files that user will never see if they are there 
or not.

But for a new potential contributor getting started with just one svn co 
will be a good point.

>   Also in its current state it isn't useful at all as it
> is broken.
>   
lol... perhaps we could consider fixing it instead of kicking it aside  :)

> I think it makes it very clear to people the state of a module before
> checking it out.  It also makes it clear to new contributors where to
> focus their energies.
>   
lol

you consider potential contributors clever enouh to make recursive svn 
co and choose  the applications they need to have a  working  phpgw dev  
directory structure ... but too stupid  to make the difference between 
supported and unsupported apps ?

i bet you're kidding :)

Architecture and organisation never replaces comunication... but both 
must go together.

For application status and effort focusing this is a question of 
communication and community coordination.

For svn trees organisation this is only a question of keeping things 
"stupid simple"... and hiding communication about apps statuses  inside 
the pathes of  svn repos will make phpgw even harder to get in that it 
is now i think.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.