Re: Organising apps in svn
Maât <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.phpgroupware.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dave Hall a écrit : > But it is for developers, not people who just want to install and use > phpgw as is. developer_tools should be a standalone module, it is not > broadly useful. setup to generate database structure definitions is no more useful... but it's in setup ! Atm we need more to attract new developers tnat to gold plate the project removing a few files that user will never see if they are there or not. But for a new potential contributor getting started with just one svn co will be a good point. > Also in its current state it isn't useful at all as it > is broken. > lol... perhaps we could consider fixing it instead of kicking it aside :) > I think it makes it very clear to people the state of a module before > checking it out. It also makes it clear to new contributors where to > focus their energies. > lol you consider potential contributors clever enouh to make recursive svn co and choose the applications they need to have a working phpgw dev directory structure ... but too stupid to make the difference between supported and unsupported apps ? i bet you're kidding :) Architecture and organisation never replaces comunication... but both must go together. For application status and effort focusing this is a question of communication and community coordination. For svn trees organisation this is only a question of keeping things "stupid simple"... and hiding communication about apps statuses inside the pathes of svn repos will make phpgw even harder to get in that it is now i think.