Re: Dirty play: copyright used as patent

Chris Weiss wrote:
> as far as contract work goes, if the contact allows Dave to hold
> copyright, then that's ReSights failure as a business entity to
> protect their investment.  And if Dave holds copyright, then he's the
> only one that can change the license and it is work for him to do so
> and he'd be right to want to charge for that.
>   
Yeah - better look up for the contract.
He was invited with the best intention of a collaboration with phpgw - 
but there was no collaboration - he went strait for a takeover - so once 
again: watch that contract.

Regards

Sigurd