RE: [phpGroupWare coordinators] Re: Who wants to play?
Sigurd Nes <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:17:41 +0100 (MET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.phpgroupware.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: Maât [[email protected]] > Sent: 2009-11-09 12:49:23 CET > To: [email protected], [email protected] > Subject: Re: [phpGroupWare coordinators] [phpGroupWare-developers] Re: Who wants to play? > > Sigurd Nes wrote: > > Maât wrote: > > > >> > >> i think we can create a per coder sub-repository so that you can publish > >> your code > >> > >> people will have the choice to checkout from your base or from default > >> base, compare codes and work on both > >> > >> then we can step by step merge features from your base to default and > >> have by the end both a clean code and a clean changelog for default base :) > >> > >> that will allow everyone to go on without deadlock :) > >> > >> Okay for that ? > >> > > I suppose so - that leaves only the license issue > > Okay so : the per coder structure is now ready and follows the > core/module base svn architecture > > so for you sigurd the "core" place is there (and empty well i created > just the trunk/tags/branches level) : > > svn+ssh://[email protected]/phpgroupware/people/sigurdne/core > > and i also added an empty module repository for property in your tree > which is there : > > svn+ssh://[email protected]/phpgroupware/people/sigurdne/modules/property > > you have also the trunk/tags/branches level created so that it's useable > just out of the box :) > > for the remaining license issue i don't understand why there is a > problem with GPL v3 > > can someone explain please ? > It seems to work :) The problem with GPLv3 is that it is not compatible with GPLv2 - and there is code in the system that is GPLv2-only. It is normal to specify " either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version" - but there is code where the "option" is left out. Here is why we can stay on GPLv2 for the current trunk: (GPLv3 is aimed to address hardware issues) http://gplv3.fsf.org/rms-why.html Don't get me wrong: I am all for moving to GPLv3 on the next framework. Benoit: Have you had the time to asses the GPLv2 vs GPLv3 ? Regards Sigurd _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers