Re: Scaled image quality?
joe panico <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pixory |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gunnar, > or have I > misunderstood the meaning of the speed/quality > setting? Speed does not refer to end-user download speed. All of the scaled images are small enough so that any fiddling with image size would produce a negligible difference in download speed. Speed refers to "thumbnailing speed"-- how long it takes Pixory to produce a thumbnail (scaled image) from the original. If you are using Pixory on a newish machine (Pentium 4 1.5 GHz+), the thumbnailing might be fast enough that you don't really notice (much) the delay in thumbnailing. However, I run Pixory on the equivalent of a Pentium III 450MHz, and I definitely notice it. So I give the user some flexibility. However: 1) With the introduction of "thumbnail precaching" and especially "background thumbnailing", these settings become much less important, because it is likely that Pixory will have already thumbnailed all of the images by the time your visitors arrive (provided, of course that you turn background thumbnailing on). I developed these settings before I introduced "background thumbnailing". 2) There's actually not a very big difference in perceptible image quality between the "quality" setting and the "compromise" setting. In fact, it's more a matter of "taste" as to which you prefer. As a result, I would stick with "compromise" if I were you. 3) I plan to get rid of these settings altogether in the long run. Eventually, I would like Pixory to just incrementally improve the image quality of thumbnails, in the background, until it has done the best it can. regards, joe --- Gunnar_Heikkilä <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > I noticed that if I set the scaled images attribute > to "optimize for > quality" the size of the images are smaller than for > the "optimize > for speed". > > I thought that the speed setting would result in > smaller pictures, so > that the download time for the modem user watching > the album becomes > shorter. That is, the JPG compression is higher for > the speed setting. > > But this does not seem to be the case? Is this an > error, or have I > misunderstood the meaning of the speed/quality > setting? > > BR > /Gunnar > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles. No Late Fees & Free Shipping. Try Netflix for FREE! http://us.click.yahoo.com/YoVfrB/XP.FAA/uetFAA/EGnolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/