Re: Apache ProxyPass
"Joe Panico" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pixory |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Folks, Perhaps it makes sense for the "mask wan port" to always mask the wan port for all viewer urls? The beauty of just taking the port from the incoming context, the way it works now, is that you can have different people accessing Pixory via different "apparent" ports, and it still all works. For instance, you could have your lan machines go against the real port, but have a proxy on the wan that removes the port from the url. If I change "mask wan port" to force port removal, then all clients will have to access the pixoy instance portless. Does this make sense for everyone? Does anyone actually use "mask wan port"? regards, joe --- In [email protected], Gabriele Bulfon <gbulfon@s...> wrote: > Thanx both for the suggestion. > First, the ProxyPreserveHost directive is not accepted by my Apache. > ProxyVia is accepted but does not solve the problem. > I cannot see a way to let Apache not rewrite the URL. > Sonicle S.r.l. > Via Felice Cavallotti 16 - 20089, Rozzano - Milano - ITALY > Tel +39 028246016 - Fax +39 028243880 > http://www.sonicle.com Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pixory-beta/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/