Re: An analysis of why Polipo is unmaintainable

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:35:42PM +0100, Urs Holzer wrote:
> > CPC is actually originally my work, and this latest paper is a continuation
> > of some work that I supervised [1]
> 
> I quickly read through this paper and it sounds interesting. (I admit, I
> skipped section 6.)

Wise choice: we wrote section 6 as a self-contained proof, and deliberately put
it at the end of the paper so that people interested in CPC but not in the
(rather technical) reasons of its correctness could easily skip it.  I'm glad it
turned out to be useful in your case.

Best regards,
-- 
Gabriel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct