Re: "502 Couldn't parse server headers"
Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:17:09 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.polipo.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> h2c Upgrades are ignored. >> Any other Upgrade content leads to a failed parse like in the >> previous behaviour. > Shouldn't all unknown upgrade requests be "ignored" (tho logged at some > appropriate info/warning level)? Right. What should be done if there's no "Connection: upgrade" header? Should the header be dropped anyway, potentially violating the spec, or should it be passed through? I don't see anything on the subject in RFC 6126, and I'm too lazy to check RFCs 7230, 7231, 7232, 7233, 7234, and 7235. (I am generally opposed to the death penalty, but whoever decided to split the spec into 6 RFCs deserves to be shot.) -- Juliusz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140