RE: [Pound Mailing List] Would pound fail to forward HTTPS request if backends have self-signed certificate only?

Thanks, I also notice that directive after reading the manual again.
________________________________
From: Emilio Campos<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: ‎9/‎4/‎2013 14:04
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Would pound fail to forward HTTPS request if backends have self-signed certificate only?

Alex you have to use the HTTPS directive for backends if you want that
pound communicates with backends in ssl.

Regards


2013/9/3 D. R. <[email protected]>

> Hi Alex,
>
> i can not confirm, i also use pound with self-signed certificates in
> different development environments.
>
> Kind regards
> David
>
> Am 03.09.2013 21:28, schrieb Alex Tsang:
> > Hi. I have pound 2.6 and a SSL certificate installed which I bought from
> Comodo.
> > I configured pound to forward HTTPS requests to backend servers over
> HTTPS, but
> > those backend servers have self-signed certificate only.
> >
> > I found that when I visit the servers over HTTPS (through pound), it
> gives me
> > e500 error. Is it caused by self-signed certificates on backend servers?
> When
> > I use curl to visit those backend servers directly I need to add the -k
> switch
> > to avoid checking certificates. I tried to configure pound to forward
> HTTPS to
> > backend servers over HTTP and it worked well, but if my backend servers
> sit in
> > different networks this would be a problem as people may capture the
> traffic
> > between pound and my backend servers.
> >
> > Many thanks.
> >
> > Alex
>  N獭脫鬳�zカu拔姄氐+a脫緉甹鐗濙忷m螐�吟泓摆!>W搸�(鑘琟�,z 府+ 荤+芰炮*'s===
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]
> Please contact [email protected] for questions.
>



--
Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project
http://www.zenloadbalancer.com
Distribution list (subscribe): zenloadbalancer-support-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uv+2+P5yyue3@public.gmane.orgt