Re: [Pound Mailing List] HTTPS BackEnd certificate issues

Scott McKeown <scott-Oteo70RhwZ77w/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pound.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Karl,

I only noticed yesterday that Centos now has OpenSSL 1.0.1e (I think it
was) in the repository so you maybe looking in the wrong place as before it
was on 0.9.8 I think.

It might be worth just double checking the versions.




On 5 December 2013 21:48, Karl Rossing <karl.rossing-Dfpe2XwFGu3SUeElwK9/[email protected]> wrote:

> I am running into the same issue below since upgrading from Centos 6.4 to
> 6.5.
>
> I was running Pound 2.7a. I also tried with Pound 2.7b and I'm still
> getting
>
>  BIO_do_handshake with <SERVER IP>:443 failed: error:1412F152:SSL
> routines:SSL_PARSE_SERVERHELLO_TLSEXT:unsafe legacy renegotiation disabled
>
> The <Server IP> is a windows box. I tried disabling the cyphers using
> https://www.nartac.com/Products/IISCrypto/Default.aspx
> and selected "Best Practices" which is pretty much the screenshot on the
> page.
>
> I might have to restore Centos 6.4 but i would prefer not to.
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> Karl
>
>
> On 10/8/2012, 11:00 AM, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
>
>> On 10/08/2012 11:10 AM, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I have a pound 2.6 installation with a HTTPS listener and several HTTPS
>>> BackEnds.
>>>
>>> The HTTPS BackEnds are mostly using self-signed certificates, which
>>> should be fine for our needs, but one of them is failing with the error:
>>>
>>> pound: BIO_do_handshake with <IP ADDRESS REMOVED>:443 failed:
>>> error:1412F152:SSL routines:SSL_PARSE_SERVERHELLO_TLSEXT:unsafe legacy
>>> renegotiation disabled
>>>
>>> Although I'm not sure, I guess this is an error with the certificate on
>>> the BackEnd HTTPS server. But is there some way to get more information on
>>> the error or perhaps just make pound ignore the error all together?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> /Thomas
>>>
>>
>> Turned out to be an unpatched Windows 2003 server. The problem was fixed
>> for Windows in September of 2010:
>>
>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/MS10-049
>>
>> Applying this fix solved the problem.
>>
>> /Thomas
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]
>> Please contact [email protected] for questions.
>>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This communication (including all attachments) is
> confidential and is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) only and
> may contain information that is private, confidential, privileged, and
> exempt from disclosure under law.  All rights to privilege are expressly
> claimed and reserved and are not waived.  Any use, dissemination,
> distribution, copying or disclosure of this message and any attachments, in
> whole or in part, by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is
> strictly
> prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify
> the sender immediately, delete this communication from all data storage
> devices and destroy all hard copies.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]
> Please contact [email protected] for questions.
>



-- 
With Kind Regards.

Scott McKeown
Loadbalancer.org
http://www.loadbalancer.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.