Re: [Pound Mailing List] Crime vulnerability on 2.7f upstream
Joe Gooch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pound.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
IIRC you'd have to have a 2048bit dh key, and/or possibly HSTS headers. openssl dhparam -5 2048 -out dh2048.pem Then specify the file for Pound in your config: DHParams "/path/to/dh2048.pem" ECDHCurve prime256v1 -- Joe Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential and legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so that proper delivery can be arranged, and please delete the message from your mail box. From: Emilio Campos Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 8:02 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Crime vulnerability on 2.7f upstream By the way, someone can obtain a A+ with pound2.7 or higher? In my case I use 2.8.a with only A. Thanks! 2015-07-10 10:44 GMT+02:00 Scott McKeown <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: Hi Mirek, Thanks, I'm guessing that there must be an additional patch in v2.7 that I've not used in our build Time to do some more testing I guess. On 10 July 2015 at 09:20, Miroslav Danek <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Scott, i use stable 2.7, CentOS 6.6 + openssl 1.0.1e [cid:18BD8925-BBA6-4363-9BB8-A6B13529BAFA] Mirek On 10. 7. 2015, at 9:56, Scott McKeown <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Mirek, What version of pound are you using for this, we have as of yet net been able to get FS with pound... On 10 July 2015 at 08:31, Miroslav Danek <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Rick, i used this one: Disable SSLv3 SSLAllowClientRenegotiation 0 SSLHonorCipherOrder 1 Ciphers "HIGH:!aNULL:!SSLv2:!ADH:!EXP:!eNULL:!RC4:MEDIUM:!LOW" Result A with FS. regards Mirek On 10. 7. 2015, at 9:07, Scott McKeown <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Rick, Your current Cipher list is very open if you can give this one a go and let us know the report status (we get an A- with no FS) EECDH+ECDSA+AESGCM:EECDH+ECDSA+SHA384:EECDH+ECDSA+SHA256:ECDH+AESGCM:ECDH+AES256:ECDH+AES128:ECDH+3DES:RSA+AESGCM:RSA+AES:RSA+3DES:!eNULL:!LOW:!aNULL:!MD5:!DSS If you could also post a sanitised copy of your pound config file we can see what we can do for you. On 9 July 2015 at 22:55, Rick Smith <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I am running Pound 2.7f from https://github.com/goochjj/pound/archive/stage_for_upstream/v2.7f.zip I am also running openssl version 1.01p from Jul 9, 2015. I am trying to achieve a better ranking for our SSL support. I have been able to move up to a C rating but for some reason here are my results. I am using the following ciphers: RC4-SHA:HIGH:!ADH:!SSLv2:!AES I enabled the Disable SSLv3 directive and I have the following also enabled for the listener: SSLAllowClientRenegotiation 0 SSLHonorCipherOrder 1 This is after much trial and error. I thought that this upstream version disabled TLS compression but it appears to still be active. Questions: 1) How can I disable TLS compression? 2) Can I enable TLS 1.1 and 1.2? 3) How can I disable support for weak DH key exchanges? 4) WHy isn't PFS enabled? I assume the ciphers need fixing? Thanks, Rick This server supports weak Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange parameters. Grade capped to B. MORE INFO »<https://weakdh.org/> This server does not mitigate the CRIME attack<https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2012/09/14/crime-information-leakage-attack-against-ssltls>. Grade capped to C. The server supports only older protocols, but not the current best TLS 1.2. Grade capped to C. MORE INFO »<https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2015/05/22/ssl-labs-increased-penalty-when-tls-12-is-not-supported> This server accepts the RC4 cipher, which is weak. Grade capped to B. MORE INFO »<https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2013/03/19/rc4-in-tls-is-broken-now-what> The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers. MORE INFO »<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_secrecy> -- With Kind Regards. Scott McKeown Loadbalancer.org<http://loadbalancer.org/> http://www.loadbalancer.org<http://www.loadbalancer.org/> Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064<tel:0%29%203303801064> (24x7) Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504<tel:%2B1%20888.867.9504> (Toll Free)(24x7) -- With Kind Regards. Scott McKeown Loadbalancer.org<http://Loadbalancer.org> http://www.loadbalancer.org<http://www.loadbalancer.org/> Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064<tel:0%29%203303801064> (24x7) Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504<tel:%2B1%20888.867.9504> (Toll Free)(24x7) -- With Kind Regards. Scott McKeown Loadbalancer.org http://www.loadbalancer.org Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064 (24x7) Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504<tel:%2B1%20888.867.9504> (Toll Free)(24x7) -- Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project http://www.zenloadbalancer.com Distribution list (subscribe): [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Screen Shot 2015-07-10 at 10.13.37.png
(image/png, 249.1 KB) - not displayed