Re: [Pound Mailing List] Crime vulnerability on 2.7f upstream
Anthony Tarlano <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pound.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robert, Can we get this patch merged into pound for the community to benefit from Frank's good work? Thanks in advanced. Anthony On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Emilio Campos < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Joe, we have been playing with your recommended url and we haven't > obtained an A+ in anyway, on other hand we have applied the Frank's patch: > > http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2014/2014-09/1411468078000 > > for your pound2.8a and we have received an +A of SSLlabs. > > Currently we haven't found any way of obtain this result without apply > this. > > Thanks and regards > > > > > 2015-07-10 20:32 GMT+02:00 Joe Gooch <[email protected]>: > >> Yeah I think this is what you need for A+ >> >> >> https://raymii.org/s/tutorials/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security_for_Apache_NGINX_and_Lighttpd.html >> >> This site goes through X-Frame-Options for IIS and HAProxy – if you adapt >> it for the HTTP-Strict-Transport-Security examples from the first link, it >> should work for you. >> >> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/X-Frame-Options >> >> -- >> Joe >> >> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential >> and legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual >> named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are >> hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance >> upon the contents of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you >> have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the >> sender, so that proper delivery can be arranged, and please delete the >> message from your mail box. >> >> >> >> From: Emilio Campos >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" >> Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 11:40 AM >> >> To: "[email protected]" >> Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Crime vulnerability on 2.7f upstream >> >> Joe, really appreciate your help, thank you so much, I will test it. >> >> Regards! >> >> 2015-07-10 17:24 GMT+02:00 Joe Gooch <[email protected]>: >> >>> IIRC you'd have to have a 2048bit dh key, and/or possibly HSTS headers. >>> >>> openssl dhparam -5 2048 -out dh2048.pem >>> >>> Then specify the file for Pound in your config: >>> DHParams "/path/to/dh2048.pem" >>> ECDHCurve prime256v1 >>> >>> -- >>> Joe >>> >>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain >>> confidential and legally privileged information that is intended only for >>> the individual named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended >>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail message is >>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission in >>> error, please reply to the sender, so that proper delivery can be arranged, >>> and please delete the message from your mail box. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Emilio Campos >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" >>> Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 8:02 AM >>> To: "[email protected]" >>> Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Crime vulnerability on 2.7f upstream >>> >>> By the way, someone can obtain a A+ with pound2.7 or higher? In my case >>> I use 2.8.a with only A. >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> 2015-07-10 10:44 GMT+02:00 Scott McKeown <scott-Oteo70RhwZ77w/[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hi Mirek, >>>> >>>> Thanks, I'm guessing that there must be an additional patch in v2.7 >>>> that I've not used in our build >>>> >>>> Time to do some more testing I guess. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10 July 2015 at 09:20, Miroslav Danek <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Scott, >>>>> >>>>> i use stable 2.7, CentOS 6.6 + openssl 1.0.1e >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mirek >>>>> >>>>> On 10. 7. 2015, at 9:56, Scott McKeown <scott-Oteo70RhwZ77w/[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Mirek, >>>>> >>>>> What version of pound are you using for this, we have as of yet net >>>>> been able to get FS with pound... >>>>> >>>>> On 10 July 2015 at 08:31, Miroslav Danek <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Rick, >>>>>> >>>>>> i used this one: >>>>>> >>>>>> Disable SSLv3 >>>>>> SSLAllowClientRenegotiation 0 >>>>>> SSLHonorCipherOrder 1 >>>>>> Ciphers "HIGH:!aNULL:!SSLv2:!ADH:!EXP:!eNULL:!RC4:MEDIUM:!LOW" >>>>>> >>>>>> Result A with FS. >>>>>> >>>>>> regards >>>>>> Mirek >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10. 7. 2015, at 9:07, Scott McKeown <scott-Oteo70RhwZ77w/[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Rick, >>>>>> >>>>>> Your current Cipher list is very open if you can give this one a go >>>>>> and let us know the report status (we get an A- with no FS) >>>>>> >>>>>> EECDH+ECDSA+AESGCM:EECDH+ECDSA+SHA384:EECDH+ECDSA+ >>>>>> SHA256:ECDH+AESGCM:ECDH+AES256:ECDH+AES128:ECDH+3DES: >>>>>> RSA+AESGCM:RSA+AES:RSA+3DES:!eNULL:!LOW:!aNULL:!MD5:!DSS >>>>>> >>>>>> If you could also post a sanitised copy of your pound config file we >>>>>> can see what we can do for you. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9 July 2015 at 22:55, Rick Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I am running Pound 2.7f from >>>>>>> https://github.com/goochjj/pound/archive/stage_for_upstream/v2.7f.zip >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am also running openssl version 1.01p from Jul 9, 2015. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am trying to achieve a better ranking for our SSL support. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have been able to move up to a C rating but for some reason here >>>>>>> are my results. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am using the following ciphers: RC4-SHA:HIGH:!ADH:!SSLv2:!AES >>>>>>> I enabled the Disable SSLv3 directive and I have the following also >>>>>>> enabled for the listener: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SSLAllowClientRenegotiation 0 >>>>>>> SSLHonorCipherOrder 1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is after much trial and error. I thought that this upstream >>>>>>> version disabled TLS compression but it appears to still be active. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Questions: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) How can I disable TLS compression? >>>>>>> 2) Can I enable TLS 1.1 and 1.2? >>>>>>> 3) How can I disable support for weak DH key exchanges? >>>>>>> 4) WHy isn't PFS enabled? I assume the ciphers need fixing? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rick >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This server supports weak Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange >>>>>>> parameters. Grade capped to B. MORE INFO » <https://weakdh.org/> >>>>>>> This server does not mitigate the CRIME attack >>>>>>> <https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2012/09/14/crime-information-leakage-attack-against-ssltls>. >>>>>>> Grade capped to C. >>>>>>> The server supports only older protocols, but not the current best >>>>>>> TLS 1.2. Grade capped to C. MORE INFO » >>>>>>> <https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2015/05/22/ssl-labs-increased-penalty-when-tls-12-is-not-supported> >>>>>>> This server accepts the RC4 cipher, which is weak. Grade capped to >>>>>>> B. MORE INFO » >>>>>>> <https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2013/03/19/rc4-in-tls-is-broken-now-what> >>>>>>> The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference >>>>>>> browsers. MORE INFO » >>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_secrecy> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> With Kind Regards. >>>>>> >>>>>> Scott McKeown >>>>>> Loadbalancer.org <http://loadbalancer.org/> >>>>>> http://www.loadbalancer.org >>>>>> Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064 (24x7) >>>>>> Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504 (Toll Free)(24x7) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With Kind Regards. >>>>> >>>>> Scott McKeown >>>>> Loadbalancer.org >>>>> http://www.loadbalancer.org >>>>> Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064 (24x7) >>>>> Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504 (Toll Free)(24x7) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With Kind Regards. >>>> >>>> Scott McKeown >>>> Loadbalancer.org >>>> http://www.loadbalancer.org >>>> Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064 (24x7) >>>> Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504 (Toll Free)(24x7) >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project >>> http://www.zenloadbalancer.com >>> Distribution list (subscribe): >>> zenloadbalancer-support-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project >> http://www.zenloadbalancer.com >> Distribution list (subscribe): >> zenloadbalancer-support-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org >> > > > > -- > Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project > http://www.zenloadbalancer.com > Distribution list (subscribe): > zenloadbalancer-support-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > -- Anthony Tarlano | Chief Cloud Architect | Exablox | http://www.exablox.com <http://exablox.com/> | (m) 650-283-0488 | (skype) tarlano
Screen Shot 2015-07-10 at 10.13.37.png
(image/png, 249.1 KB) - not displayed