Re: [Pound Mailing List] Crime vulnerability on 2.7f upstream

Anthony Tarlano <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pound.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Robert,

Can we get this patch merged into pound for the community to benefit from
Frank's good work?

Thanks in advanced.

Anthony

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Emilio Campos <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Joe, we have been playing with your recommended url and we haven't
> obtained an A+ in anyway, on other hand we have applied the Frank's patch:
>
> http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2014/2014-09/1411468078000
>
> for your pound2.8a and we have received an +A of SSLlabs.
>
> Currently we haven't found any way of obtain this result without apply
> this.
>
> Thanks and regards
>
>
>
>
> 2015-07-10 20:32 GMT+02:00 Joe Gooch <[email protected]>:
>
>> Yeah I think this is what you need for A+
>>
>>
>> https://raymii.org/s/tutorials/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security_for_Apache_NGINX_and_Lighttpd.html
>>
>> This site goes through X-Frame-Options for IIS and HAProxy – if you adapt
>> it for the HTTP-Strict-Transport-Security examples from the first link, it
>> should work for you.
>>
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/X-Frame-Options
>>
>> --
>> Joe
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential
>> and legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual
>> named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
>> hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance
>> upon the contents of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the
>> sender, so that proper delivery can be arranged, and please delete the
>> message from your mail box.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Emilio Campos
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]"
>> Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 11:40 AM
>>
>> To: "[email protected]"
>> Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Crime vulnerability on 2.7f upstream
>>
>> Joe, really appreciate your help, thank you so much, I will test it.
>>
>> Regards!
>>
>> 2015-07-10 17:24 GMT+02:00 Joe Gooch <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> IIRC you'd have to have a 2048bit dh key, and/or possibly HSTS headers.
>>>
>>> openssl dhparam -5 2048 -out dh2048.pem
>>>
>>> Then specify the file for Pound in your config:
>>> DHParams        "/path/to/dh2048.pem"
>>> ECDHCurve       prime256v1
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain
>>> confidential and legally privileged information that is intended only for
>>> the individual named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail message is
>>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission in
>>> error, please reply to the sender, so that proper delivery can be arranged,
>>> and please delete the message from your mail box.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Emilio Campos
>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]"
>>> Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 8:02 AM
>>> To: "[email protected]"
>>> Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Crime vulnerability on 2.7f upstream
>>>
>>> By the way, someone can obtain a A+ with pound2.7 or higher? In my case
>>> I use 2.8.a with only A.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-07-10 10:44 GMT+02:00 Scott McKeown <scott-Oteo70RhwZ77w/[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Mirek,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, I'm guessing that there must be an additional patch in v2.7
>>>> that I've not used in our build
>>>>
>>>> Time to do some more testing I guess.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 July 2015 at 09:20, Miroslav Danek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Scott,
>>>>>
>>>>> i use stable 2.7, CentOS 6.6 + openssl 1.0.1e
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mirek
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10. 7. 2015, at 9:56, Scott McKeown <scott-Oteo70RhwZ77w/[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mirek,
>>>>>
>>>>> What version of pound are you using for this, we have as of yet net
>>>>> been able to get FS with pound...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10 July 2015 at 08:31, Miroslav Danek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rick,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i used this one:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Disable SSLv3
>>>>>> SSLAllowClientRenegotiation 0
>>>>>> SSLHonorCipherOrder 1
>>>>>> Ciphers "HIGH:!aNULL:!SSLv2:!ADH:!EXP:!eNULL:!RC4:MEDIUM:!LOW"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Result A with FS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards
>>>>>> Mirek
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10. 7. 2015, at 9:07, Scott McKeown <scott-Oteo70RhwZ77w/[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rick,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your current Cipher list is very open if you can give this one a go
>>>>>> and let us know the report status (we get an A- with no FS)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EECDH+ECDSA+AESGCM:EECDH+ECDSA+SHA384:EECDH+ECDSA+
>>>>>> SHA256:ECDH+AESGCM:ECDH+AES256:ECDH+AES128:ECDH+3DES:
>>>>>> RSA+AESGCM:RSA+AES:RSA+3DES:!eNULL:!LOW:!aNULL:!MD5:!DSS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you could also post a sanitised copy of your pound config file we
>>>>>> can see what we can do for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9 July 2015 at 22:55, Rick Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am running Pound 2.7f from
>>>>>>> https://github.com/goochjj/pound/archive/stage_for_upstream/v2.7f.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am also running openssl version 1.01p from Jul 9, 2015.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am trying to achieve a better ranking for our SSL support.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been able to move up to a C rating but for some reason here
>>>>>>> are my results.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am using the following ciphers: RC4-SHA:HIGH:!ADH:!SSLv2:!AES
>>>>>>> I enabled the Disable SSLv3 directive and I have the following also
>>>>>>> enabled for the listener:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SSLAllowClientRenegotiation     0
>>>>>>> SSLHonorCipherOrder 1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is after much trial and error.  I thought that this upstream
>>>>>>> version disabled TLS compression but it appears to still be active.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Questions:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1)  How can I disable TLS compression?
>>>>>>> 2)  Can I enable TLS 1.1 and 1.2?
>>>>>>> 3)  How can I disable support for weak DH key exchanges?
>>>>>>> 4)  WHy isn't PFS enabled?  I assume the ciphers need fixing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This server supports weak Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange
>>>>>>> parameters. Grade capped to B.   MORE INFO » <https://weakdh.org/>
>>>>>>> This server does not mitigate the CRIME attack
>>>>>>> <https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2012/09/14/crime-information-leakage-attack-against-ssltls>.
>>>>>>> Grade capped to C.
>>>>>>> The server supports only older protocols, but not the current best
>>>>>>> TLS 1.2. Grade capped to C.  MORE INFO »
>>>>>>> <https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2015/05/22/ssl-labs-increased-penalty-when-tls-12-is-not-supported>
>>>>>>> This server accepts the RC4 cipher, which is weak. Grade capped to
>>>>>>> B.  MORE INFO »
>>>>>>> <https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2013/03/19/rc4-in-tls-is-broken-now-what>
>>>>>>> The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference
>>>>>>> browsers.  MORE INFO »
>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_secrecy>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> With Kind Regards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott McKeown
>>>>>> Loadbalancer.org <http://loadbalancer.org/>
>>>>>> http://www.loadbalancer.org
>>>>>> Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064 (24x7)
>>>>>> Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504 (Toll Free)(24x7)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With Kind Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott McKeown
>>>>> Loadbalancer.org
>>>>> http://www.loadbalancer.org
>>>>> Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064 (24x7)
>>>>> Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504 (Toll Free)(24x7)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With Kind Regards.
>>>>
>>>> Scott McKeown
>>>> Loadbalancer.org
>>>> http://www.loadbalancer.org
>>>> Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064 (24x7)
>>>> Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504 (Toll Free)(24x7)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project
>>> http://www.zenloadbalancer.com
>>> Distribution list (subscribe):
>>> zenloadbalancer-support-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project
>> http://www.zenloadbalancer.com
>> Distribution list (subscribe):
>> zenloadbalancer-support-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project
> http://www.zenloadbalancer.com
> Distribution list (subscribe):
> zenloadbalancer-support-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>



-- 
Anthony Tarlano | Chief Cloud Architect | Exablox | http://www.exablox.com
<http://exablox.com/> | (m) 650-283-0488 | (skype) tarlano
Screen Shot 2015-07-10 at 10.13.37.png (image/png, 249.1 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.