Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound sessions with cookies
weirdfish+subs <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Aug 2016 15:02:59 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pound.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for quick reply, Joe, I've just found JBoss docs about JSESSIONID - I'll try it out On 03.08.2016 14:25, Joe Gooch wrote: > Yes, with session type cookie, it creates a session table based on an application created cookie. In your case, probably JSESSIONID is what you want. > > If you're using my branch on Github, you can explore the BackendCookie option - this option would have pound create a cookie that uniquely identifies the random backend chosen... Removing the need for a session table. (Which means the sessions continue to work even if you restart pound) > > ------ > > Joe > > From: weirdfish+subs <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 8:32 AM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [Pound Mailing List] Pound sessions with cookies > > Hi, > I currently have pound set to use sticky sessions with IP addresses. I have a feeling that I'm going to encounter issues with more than one user coming from behind the same firewall, so would like to explore the possibility of using cookies instead. > My set up is that I have a 3rd party application which runs on JBoss. I have 5 JBoss app servers, and Pound balancing load across them. > When I look at the documentation for Pound using cookies, it requires a cookie name. Is this cookie something that the application must specifically create? > Your help much appreciated. > Cheers > Wayne > > Nrzǧuޙ+ayn˛mhulDŽ^jǜ{ZrȬr讫ب