Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound sessions with cookies

weirdfish+subs <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Aug 2016 15:02:59 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pound.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 

Thanks for quick reply, Joe, I've just found JBoss docs about
JSESSIONID - I'll try it out 

On 03.08.2016 14:25, Joe Gooch wrote: 

>
Yes, with session type cookie, it creates a session table based on an
application created cookie. In your case, probably JSESSIONID is what
you want.
> 
> If you're using my branch on Github, you can explore the
BackendCookie option - this option would have pound create a cookie that
uniquely identifies the random backend chosen... Removing the need for a
session table. (Which means the sessions continue to work even if you
restart pound)
> 
> ------
> 
> Joe
> 
> From: weirdfish+subs
<[email protected]>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 8:32 AM
> To:
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Pound Mailing List] Pound
sessions with cookies
> 
> Hi,
> I currently have pound set to use
sticky sessions with IP addresses. I have a feeling that I'm going to
encounter issues with more than one user coming from behind the same
firewall, so would like to explore the possibility of using cookies
instead.
> My set up is that I have a 3rd party application which runs
on JBoss. I have 5 JBoss app servers, and Pound balancing load across
them.
> When I look at the documentation for Pound using cookies, it
requires a cookie name. Is this cookie something that the application
must specifically create?
> Your help much appreciated.
> Cheers
>
Wayne
> 
> Nrzǧuޙ+ayn˛mhulDŽ^jǜ{ZrȬr讫ب