Re: Release date for Privoxy 3.0.19 stable

Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 12/27/11, Fabian Keil <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

> >> I finally got around to checking email again..  Windows build is up on
> >> SF and, after a bit of poking around, privoxy-setup 3.0.19 is the
> >> default windows download :)
> >
> > Great. I assume you built it with IPv6 support?
> 
> Yes.  I did the build on a Vista machine using winsetup/GNUmakefile so
> the configure options were
>   ./configure --enable-mingw32 --disable-pthread
> --disable-dynamic-pcre --enable-zlib

It's unfortunate that --disable-dynamic-pcre seems to be
necessary on Windows, but other than that these look like
reasonable settings for most users.

> > I ask because I recently got a request for a Privoxy 3.0.18
> > binary for Windows without IPv6 support, as the ones with
> > IPv6 support apparently don't work on "older Windows versions".
> >
> > Quoting the German error message:
> > |Die Datei PRIVOXY.EXE ist nicht verknüpft mit dem fehlenden
> > Export-WS2_32.DLL:freeaddrinfo.
> > |
> > |Ein an das System angeschlossenes Gerät funktioniert nicht
> >
> > As the mail was send through an anonymous remailer I couldn't
> > ask for details. I got the mail twice, so I thought that the
> > second one went to the mailing list, but I just checked and
> > it was only sent to my SF address ...
> >
> > Do you think it would be feasible to provide both flavours?
> 
> There's a slight problem.  Doing a build on Vista after a
>   ./configure --enable-mingw32 --disable-ipv6-support
> dies with
> gcc -c -pipe -O2 -DWINVER=0x501   -mwindows -mno-cygwin -Wall -Ipcre
> jbsockets.c -o jbsockets.o
> jbsockets.c: In function `get_host_information':
> jbsockets.c:979: error: `NI_MAXSERV' undeclared (first use in this function)
> jbsockets.c:979: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> jbsockets.c:979: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[1]: *** [jbsockets.o] Error 1

Interesting. We probably shouldn't use that define when
--disable-ipv6-support has been used anyway.

Does moving the "#include <netdb.h>" above the first
"#ifdef _WIN32" in jbsockets.c work?

If it doesn't, simply defining NI_MAXSERV should do:

#ifndef NI_MAXSERV
#define	NI_MAXSERV	32
#endif

32 is the value used on FreeBSD and more than big enough
to contain any port number as string.

> I'll try to come up with a fix, but I'd rather not release a version
> of Privoxy without you reviewing the changes.  I've still got an XP
> machine - I'll see if a build there works.  If no, your anonymous
> requester is going to have to wait a day or two for an ipv4 only
> version.

I assume the requester can live with that and will be glad
to be able to update at all. If not, she or he should.

Fabian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox

_______________________________________________
Ijbswa-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk77VeEACgkQSMVSH78upWPa7QCfQcDkY47LYlkjhXUqNgZqTp4F
p4kAoIqajd+kzFMsu5c7xdroYrC5X4yN
=fhbr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----