[ ijbswa-Feature Requests-3502414 ] Add proxy list support
SourceForge.net <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.privoxy.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Feature Requests item #3502414, was opened at 2012-03-12 00:44 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by fabiankeil You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=361118&aid=3502414&group_id=11118 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Configuration Group: future >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Bekler (bekler) >Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil) Summary: Add proxy list support Initial Comment: Add support for a list of external proxies. Add to Section 5 of the file config.txt option for the file that contains a list of proxy servers. For example: forwarding-proxy-list ./proxy-list.txt # file with list of proxy servers forwarding-proxy-time-to-change 30 # time in seconds to change active proxy-server Proxy-list.txt file should contain a list of working proxies. For example: proxy-server1.com: 8080 proxy-server2.net: 3128 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil) Date: 2012-03-12 10:59 Message: Thanks for the suggestion. Note that Privoxy currently allows to chose the proxy depending on the URL and with your proposal that flexibility would be lost. On the TODO list there's already an item to allow to specify fallback proxies. Once we have a fallback policy, we could add other policies to chose the proxy like round-robin or time-based load balancing. If we additionally had a "include" directive we would have a more general solution that would allow to do everything you want, except that the syntax would be a bit different. I though the "include" already was on the TODO list, but apparently I didn't push the branch yet. Having said that, it's not clear to me that proxy load balancing belongs into Privoxy itself when it can already be done through DNS or the packet filter. I'm aware that doing that on Windows might be complicated, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=361118&aid=3502414&group_id=11118 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2