Re: Privoxy

Fabian Keil <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.privoxy.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] wrote:

> I downloaded your package from the mirror using
> 
> sudo apt-get install privoxy and was ccorrectly installed on my own

Note that we don't operate apt-get mirrors.
 
> GNU/linux gNewSense a distribution GNU/linux 100% Free Software then i
> decided to read your manual, that i found in /etc/privoxy and i opened
> the file config with the editor nano.
> 
> nano config
> 
> very interesting the manual, but i could understand the manual for
> GNU/linux or GNU/KFreeBSD or NetBSD or OpenBSD, but sincerely i don't
> understand all the other operating systems such as microsft windows,
> apple computer cupertino.inc mac os x, commodore amiga os, ibm os/2, sun
> microsystems solaris
> 
> i downloaded a package *.deb and this means that i am interested to
> GNU/linux, i am not interested to all the other operating systems which
> are in the world.
> 
> i download from the mirror which normally has only 100% Free Software ?

I don't know what inclusion policies your mirror operators use.

> why your manual explain the use for 100% Non Free Operating Systems ?

Because Privoxy is used on non-free operating systems as well.
 
> so if a person download a package *.deb it is necessary to find things
> explained very well only for our operating systems which are 100% Free
> Software.
> 
> it's not important to find a complete manual for all the others operating
> systems.

It's not important but as long as it doesn't cause confusion I
don't consider it a problem. Also note that there are persons who
use Privoxy on more than a single operating system. Some of them
prefer a single Privoxy manual where they can skip the parts
they don't care about.

> the Free Software Foundation put to disposition these GNU/linux
> distributions which are 100% Free Software and gives its own support only
> to two ones, for problems due to time, that is always few, for the big
> job they have to do.
> 
> GNU/linux Blag, GNU/linux Dragora, GNU/linux Dynebolic, GNU/linux
> gNewSense (support of http://www.fsf.org) GNU/linux Musix, GNU/linux
> Parabola, GNU/linux Trisquel, GNU/linux Ututo (support of
> http://www.fsf.org), GNU/linux Venenux.
> 
> Debianis working to GNU/HURD and to GNU/KFreeBSD !
> 
> i cleaned a little your manual, but i can't know which parts are for
> ibm, microsoft, apple, sun microsystems, commodore amiga os.

Most parts are relevant for all operating systems Privoxy runs on.
The exceptions should already clearly name the operating systems they
target.

> please i invite to clean the manual from all that things which does not
> refers to *.nix operating systems such as:

I think a patch that simply removes documentation for supported
operating systems would be more appropriate for downstream
distributions that package Privoxy.

To solve the "problem" upstream would require a patch that allows
to optionally skip parts of the platform-specific documentation
when regenerating it.

If you feel strongly about this, feel free to submit one.
 
> and if i am dowloading a package for *.deb i need only *.deb, about all
> the other one, it is not important, all the other ones which desire to
> use mac os x, windows, os/2, commodore amiga, ... must have acess to a
> directory where is possible to find only for non free software operating
> systems !

Why is this segregation important?

> Those GNU/linux distributions such as GNU/KFreeBSD and GNU/HURD are
> working hardly, and they want only things which refers to Free Software
> and i can
> understood them, and this to give people the Freedom to use an operating
> system cleaned by support to restricted packages.

Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and Debian GNU/Hurd aren't actually
GNU/Linux distributions.

Also note that mentioning proprietary operating systems in the
documentation isn't forbidden by the Debian Free Software
Guidelines (http://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html),
so it's not clear to me which restrictions you are referring to.

> i send you back your manual, and i hope that you can work to remove all
> the support to mac os x, microsoft windows, sun microsystems solaris, ibm
> os/2 ,
> commodore amiga os.
> 
> for any download must be available the own support but can't be mixed in
> the same manual.
> 
> for example if we are using GNU/linux Blag based on GNU/linux Fedora a
> 100% Free Software, we can't find all explained for all the other
> GNU/linux distributions and this is clear.
> 
> if we are using GNU/linux gNewSense we don't need support for GNU/linux
> Blag, if we are using GNU/linux Ututo we don't need support for GNU/linux
> Blag and GNU/linux gNewSense.

None of these distributions are explicitly mentioned in the Privoxy
documentation anyway. Deleting the documentation for other platforms
will not solve this.

> we need a Privoxy manual for every distribution !

Patches welcome.

> awaiting your new manual cleaned and available for *.deb

Don't hold your breath.

Fabian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

_______________________________________________
Ijbswa-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 196 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk+a6xsACgkQSMVSH78upWMc/ACfWEsbJmfxIdTRVzizpuqmBM0w
1tEAnA8kSCknUNDUGypY3pjMcQPeHBGf
=gKUC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.