Re: 3.0.20 ChangeLog progress

Ian Silvester <[email protected]> wrote:

> Another question - should I specify each and every case of comment tidying or just add a general "various typo corrections and comprehensibility improvements"?

As comments affect neither the binary nor the user I don't think
each modification has to be explicitly mentioned.

In my opinion typo corrections for the documentation can be combined
like you suggested unless the typo caused a lot of confusion. For example
if a directive was consistently written wrong and the user was thus
unable to use it without checking the sources.

I don't think that ever happened, though.

In general our ChangeLog is already pretty verbose compared to
ChangeLogs from other projects and combining a few more entries
probably wouldn't hurt. For example it's unclear how many users
really care about a detailed "Log message improvements" section.

Fabian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery
and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts.
SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612

_______________________________________________
Ijbswa-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlDtQUQACgkQSMVSH78upWMPBQCeKUIlteoINKb/CjgnlvDz1FRr
TLcAnj0BKv0L5ZgjbMZG32sD8/E3gKBP
=Vp2n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----