Re: privoxy 3.0.20 - connection reset by peer

Sebastian Müller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.privoxy.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 15.02.2013 13:23, schrieb Ian Silvester:> Hi Sebastian,
 >
 > Very glad to hear you sourced the root of the problem!
 >
 > How strange that it affected only this one site though. I'd be 
tempted to try to work out why prioritised UDP might affect that site 
specifically - what is it loading that puts a load on UDP.
 >
 > Curious!
 >
 > Ian
 >
 >

Hi Ian,


I talked to somebody at openwrt IRC channel.

We investigated about that QoS thing, but werent able to solve.


tcpdump with qos and privoxy
http://cloudshark.org/captures/ff30993df4b2

tcpdump without qos but privoxy
http://www.cloudshark.org/captures/8a4e564fb045

tcpdump without qos and without privoxy
http://www.cloudshark.org/captures/f5a32b0a4672


to quote a little:
 > So, that packet range
 > I listed for your latest* capture; it's normal to
 > see a "small amount" of dupes or fast retrans
 > for TCP, but the collection you got and the fact
 > that it went back to "slow-start" (ie: retrans,
 > not fast retrans in the pcap) suggests more
 > serious latency. I'm not sure if the proxy+qos
 > just chokes harder on this, and perhaps the QoS
 > introduces further re-ordering/delays that just
 > push this whole thing over the edge for that
 > specific web server

*latest -> the 2nd link




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.