Re: Compilation warnings in jbsockets.c

Ian Silvester <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.privoxy.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2013-03-07, at 7:14 AM, Fabian Keil wrote:

> Ian Silvester <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> The failure is something you might be interested in though Fabian since it has arisen
>> since 3.0.20. My default OS X config now serves the user manual locally, and test 591
>> fails as follows:
>> 
>> ./privoxy-regression-test.pl --privoxy-address 127.0.0.1:8118 --show-skipped-tests --max-level 109
>> 2013-03-06 15:49:05: Asking Privoxy for the number of action files available ...
>> 2013-03-06 15:49:05: Gathering regression tests from 4 action file(s) delivered by Privoxy 3.0.21.
>> 2013-03-06 15:49:05: Executing regression tests ...
> [...]
>> 2013-03-06 15:49:14: Ooops. We expected status code 200, but received: 500.
>> 2013-03-06 15:49:14: Failure for test 591. URL 'http://p.p/user-manual/p_doc.css' and expected status code '200'
>> 2013-03-06 15:49:15: Executed 667 regression tests. Skipped 13. 666 successes, 1 failures.
>> 
>> My config is as follows:
>> 
>> user-manual /usr/local/share/doc/privoxy/user-manual/ 
>> 
>> p_doc.css is in the base folder for documentation (/usr/local/share/doc/privoxy),
>> not in the user-manual subfolder. Is this related to the documentation cleanup
>> you've done since 3.0.20 or something at my end?
> 
> How was the user-manual directory populated?

My package builder modue includes a script I wrote that simply copies the /doc hierarchy as-is to the correct location in the OS X package hierarchy.
> 
> In the repository we have only one p_doc.css file and the
> "install" target is responsible for copying it into both
> the doc and the doc/user-manual directories.
> 
> If you aren't using the "install" target for your packages
> you'll have to add the file manually.

Well well, what a winding way to have found a bug in my packaging!! And yet another last-minute fix for 3.0.21 ;o)

Ian



> Fabian
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester  
> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the  
> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to 
> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev_______________________________________________
> Ijbswa-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester  
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the  
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to 
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.