[ ijbswa-Bugs-3614835 ] Disabling all filter files results in incorrect log messages

Bugs item #3614835, was opened at 2013-07-29 17:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fabiankeil
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=111118&aid=3614835&group_id=11118

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
>Category: None
>Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Stefan Kurtz (nox1911)
>Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
>Summary: Disabling all filter files results in incorrect log messages

Initial Comment:
Hallo,
i want to use Privoxy as http/socks gateway (forward-socks) so the traffic should remain untouched. When i comment out all filter/action files in configuration file i get massive errors.
Error: Inconsistent configuration: tagging enabled, but no taggers available.
Error: Inconsistent configuration: header filtering enabled, but no matching filters available.

This is my configuration:

Actions Files:
None specified
Filter Files:
None specified
Trust File:
None specified 	

user-manual ./doc/user-manual/
confdir .
logdir .
logfile privoxy.log
debug 1
debug 1024
debug 4096
debug 8192
listen-address 127.0.0.1:8118
listen-address 192.168.1.6:8118
toggle 0
enable-remote-toggle 0
enable-remote-http-toggle 0
enable-edit-actions 0
enforce-blocks 0
buffer-limit 4096
enable-proxy-authentication-forwarding 0
forwarded-connect-retries 0
accept-intercepted-requests 1
allow-cgi-request-crunching 0
split-large-forms 0
keep-alive-timeout 5
tolerate-pipelining 1
socket-timeout 300
log-messages 1
log-buffer-size 1
log-max-lines 200
log-highlight-messages 1

What's wrong here?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2013-08-06 06:08

Message:
Thanks for the report. Fixed in CVS.

As my previous message apparently didn't make it:

As a workaround you could keeping the default.filter file enabled and just
comment out the action files. The memory fingerprint shouldn't matter, but
you could further reduce it anyway by using a filter file with a single
line like this:

FILTER: empty Empty filter to workaround Privoxy bug #3614835

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=111118&aid=3614835&group_id=11118

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk